Friday, November 20, 2009

To a Mr. O. M. Warner

"They do say," Mr. Adams said to Old Man Warner, who stood next to him, "that over in the north village they're talking of giving up the lottery."

Old Man Warner snorted. "Pack of crazy fools," he said. "Listening to the young folks, nothing's good enough for them. Next thing you know, they'll be wanting to go back to living in caves, nobody work any more, live hat way for a while.”


What is the significance of Old Man Warner bringing up the "young folks". What role do young people play in our society?

In the short story, “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson, Old Man Warner speaks of the “young folks” and how, by listening to them, it would result in a regression of society. He considers the youth in society lazy and that “nothing's good enough for them”. The significance of this to the story, though, is that it reflects on the lottery itself. At this point of the story, we do not know the actual prize of the lottery and it foreshadows that a dark reward looms in the distance for the one “lucky” individual. This is due to the fact “that over in the north village they're talking of giving up the lottery” (-Mr. Adams ). If it is a prize that has people wanting to abolish it, then the reward must have a negative impact on the winner. Also, due to Warner's retort to this and his incorporation of the young folk, we know that this is due to the new ideas of a younger generation. As time goes by, we find the perspective of the youth in society to be more progressive and humane than the last generation. Each generation is given a new set of eyes to view the society that they live in differently than that which has already been seen. They have these crisp and vibrant eyes to see what the older generation's eyes can not see anymore. The older generation grew up with their own principals, their own customs, and were taught from a very young age what was considered right and wrong in their era. But times change and youth are given the chance to question what is put before them. By each generation that questioning is made stronger with parents passing on their own ideals – which may not necessarily agree with what society believes in at the time – to their children. Consequently, the young populace in our society are the construction workers of this building we call civilization. With each generation, new standards are met, new problems are faced, and new traditions are made. Children and adolescence look at these problems through everyday life, they look at how their elders deal and cope with the circumstances facing them, and, most importantly, they ask questions and formulate ideas and plans for the future. These questions, ideas, and plans are indeed the bricks they will use to construct the sky high buildings they need to make, the sky scrapers they must harness themselves onto to create a more advanced, more harmonious, and more equal civilization. The youth are the leaders of tomorrow, and when their own eyes grow weary of what they see, and when their own eyes start to droop and glaze over with the hardships of their lives and their generation, another more youthful group shall take their place, leading the world on. Therefore, I would just like to mention to a Mr. O. M. Warner, that his view upon society's youth is completely irrational. Listening to the young folk does not mean a regression in society, but indeed it results in an ultimate progression of life; their role in society is nothing short of being the leaders of our world tomorrow.
-Khu

6 comments:

  1. More progressive and humane? I don't think so. Back a few years ago, it wasn't even legal to show blood on TV, but now it's gushing out like now tomorrow. How is this more humane? Our media is showing the children of today that, well this violence isn't okay, but they glorify it. This is kind of like that saying, "Do as I say, not as I do."

    ReplyDelete
  2. I meant more progressive and humane as in the outlook of our generation today. We see countless civil rights and environmental groups today which are have been created and are led by youth. For example, the organization "Free the Children" was started by a group of 12 year olds and has now flourished to touch the farthest corners of the globe and has attracted thousands to their cause. You are considering the fact that the media today are glorifying and advertising the blood and gore in simple television, magazines, newspapers, and the internet, but this has come due to a respect of freedom that has been established after each generation stood up for what they believed in. They have fought for freedom of expression through each rising generation. But this freedom includes the freedom of the media to pronounce blood and violence, and yes, it may be broadcasting it to children substantially but there are viewer discretion warnings and many things put in place to try to prevent that (like putting the adult shows later in the evening). The media, while trying to get ratings for shows, can not control what the children watch. And even though glorifying violence is wrong, this is what we live in today. Perhaps you can put that in a response next time for the blog.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Lets abreviate Mr O.M even further...MOM...

    ReplyDelete
  4. In short, this ESSAY is excellent. Yes, this ESSAY is very well written. It is true that every right, freedom, and priviledge comes at a cost and a greater cost to maintain it. However, is it right for us to destroy such freedom or rights just because it can be abused? Is the freedom that is doing the wrongs or is it the people who are abusing it?

    Nice long ESSAY. Read the requirement again.

    ReplyDelete
  5. HAHA, Jisong's first comment actually made me laugh really hard.
    I am too easily amused.

    ReplyDelete
  6. LOL I completely agree with you Amy (don't worry, I'm amused extremely easily myself) :D. To Jisong though, thank you for your comments on my 'excellent essay'. Just consider it a well organized paragraph, I guess. :) I just guess that "my speedometer [was] destroyed by [my] eagerness to discuss this topic"*, right, Jisong? :)



    *If you're curious, this quote was taken from Jisong's own comment in response to comments posted on his blog. : )

    p.s. in more response to his comment: i think it the people who are doing the wrongs, not technically the freedom or right itself. It would not be right to destroy such freedoms in consequence of action that has been caused by some like minded individuals. Common sense and a sincerity to others can easily avoid the abuse of freedom, but as we know too well, this is often not the case.

    ReplyDelete